Yes. When published standards don’t match your geometry, materials, or use conditions, we can design a fit-for-purpose method that targets your actual risk points. We document the rationale, fixtures, parameters, and acceptance criteria so the method is repeatable and reviewable. When needed, we also validate the method itself—establishing key performance characteristics (e.g., repeatability/reproducibility, sensitivity, and operator/fixture effects) and defining controls—so the results are defensible for validation, audits, and decision-making.

Yes—deliverables typically include a clear summary of the method, test conditions, results, observations (including failure modes), and any deviations. We can align the reporting format to your internal templates when needed. If you’re using the data for a validation package, we’ll structure it for easy incorporation.

Yes—failure analysis and troubleshooting are common use cases. We can help replicate conditions, localize failure modes (e.g., channel leaks, weak seals, over-sealing), and provide practical recommendations for next experiments. The focus is on actionable root-cause direction, not just a pass/fail.